{"id":1369,"date":"2010-05-04T01:06:13","date_gmt":"2010-05-04T01:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theredphoenix.wordpress.com\/?p=1369"},"modified":"2010-05-04T01:06:13","modified_gmt":"2010-05-04T01:06:13","slug":"on-petty-bourgeois-ideology-social-democracy-to-fascism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/2010\/05\/on-petty-bourgeois-ideology-social-democracy-to-fascism\/","title":{"rendered":"On Petty-Bourgeois Ideology: Social Democracy to\u00a0Fascism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/charlottehutson.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/08\/locke.jpg?resize=303%2C354\" alt=\"\" width=\"303\" height=\"354\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><strong>What is the Petty-Bourgeoisie &amp; What is their Aim?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:left;\"><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><span style=\"color:#000000;\">The petty-bourgeoisie is a sub-stratum of the bourgeoisie class who own their own  means of production. They are inherently capitalist, yet they cannot be  said to have the same power and influence in the marketplace as larger  capitalists. This leads to a group which, while fundamentally opposed to  the interests of the proletariat, doesn&#8217;t necessarily share the  interests of the bigger bourgeoisie in all cases. This leads to a &#8220;third  position&#8221; which is against imperial capitalism (capitalism taken to its  logical conclusion) and socialism.<\/p>\n<p><\/span><strong><span style=\"color:#000000;\">Liberalism and Social  Democracy<\/span><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/anticap.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/11\/socialdemocracy.png?resize=209%2C296\" alt=\"\" width=\"209\" height=\"296\" \/><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#000000;\">Despite the rhetoric one hears in the arena of  mainstream politics, classical liberalism and neoliberalism share a  common vein in their stalwart defense of bourgeois property. The rhetoric of defending &#8220;the middle class&#8221; from &#8220;corporatism&#8221; is where the  bourgeois ideology and petty-bourgeois ideology are divided, yet both  political expressions end up supporting a bourgeois line at the end of  the day, and at this phase petty-bourgeois ideology is not yet ready to  confront the hegemony of the big bourgeoisie. In fact, petty-bourgeois  ideology can never do this in earnest, for reasons I will lay out below.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><strong>Anarchism:  &#8220;Left&#8221; &amp; Right<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:left;\"><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.stencilpunks.org\/calvin_anarchism.gif?resize=230%2C347\" alt=\"\" width=\"230\" height=\"347\" \/>In anarchism, we see petty-bourgeois ideology  become more &#8220;radical&#8221; in that denunciation and &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; banter is  put forward in two different ways. The &#8220;left&#8221; of anarchism, consisting  of anarcho-communists, anarcho-syndicalists, and other &#8220;libertarian  socialists&#8221; such as Kautskyites and Luxemburgists. These so-called  &#8220;revolutionaries&#8221; pay lip service to a working class line, yet their  liberal ideology leads them to prioritizing petty-bourgeois  individualism over revolution. The result of this confused set of  priorities and general ideological impotency is a line with no realistic  conception of how revolution will be won and how post-capitalist  society will be defended from counter-revolutionary forces.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#000000;\">The right of  anarchism, the anarcho-capitalist &#8220;libertarianism&#8221; of such  reactionaries as Ron Paul and (insert libertopian name here), falls  into the same problem with their battle against corporatism. Anarchists  want revolution against &#8220;authority,&#8221; yet fail to understand that  revolution is inherently authoritarian (in that it imposes the authority  of one class over another), and anarcho-capitalists want a &#8220;free  market&#8221; without a small group coming out on top and dominating it. Both  ideologies are ultimately an expression of Utopian desires on behalf of  those who cling to petty-bourgeois ideology, and at the end of the day  have no teeth in challenging for a moment the power of the big  bourgeoisie.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:left;\"><span style=\"color:#000000;\"><strong>Fascism: Petty-Bourgeois Ideology&#8217;s Logical Conclusion<\/strong><br \/>\n<img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/drkatesview.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/12\/fascism.jpg?resize=287%2C318\" alt=\"\" width=\"287\" height=\"318\" \/><br \/>\nThe final manifestation of petty-bourgeois ideology is  fascism, which is the truest expression of petty-bourgeois ideology.  Fascism is the most openly terrorist form of capitalism, Here bourgeois liberalism is thrown out the window for nationalism and  statism to &#8220;overcome&#8221; class conflict, and the rhetoric launched forward is both seemingly critical of  capitalism and in direct opposition to the working class. Speak with  any fascist and they will talk about a &#8220;third party option&#8221; between  communism and capitalism. Nazis, for instance, speak of both as being  &#8220;Jewish conspiracies.&#8221; The first two expressions of petty-bourgeois  ideology had no teeth to take on either the bosses or the workers, yet  here fascism gives the petty-bourgeois an axe to wield against the  proletariat, ultimately serving the ends of capitalism by repressing and  murdering those who pose the greatest threat to it.<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is the Petty-Bourgeoisie &amp; What is their Aim? The petty-bourgeoisie is a sub-stratum of the bourgeoisie class who own their own means of production&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":39230,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[92],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-theory"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/redphoenix.news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/locke.jpg?fit=485%2C566&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1369\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39230"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}