{"id":23963,"date":"2020-05-11T10:39:58","date_gmt":"2020-05-11T14:39:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theredphoenixapl.org\/?p=23963"},"modified":"2020-05-11T10:39:58","modified_gmt":"2020-05-11T14:39:58","slug":"marxist-leninist-communist-party-ecuador-the-indigenous-and-popular-uprising-of-october-its-lessons-and-the-perspectives-for-revolutionary-struggle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/2020\/05\/marxist-leninist-communist-party-ecuador-the-indigenous-and-popular-uprising-of-october-its-lessons-and-the-perspectives-for-revolutionary-struggle\/","title":{"rendered":"Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (Ecuador):  &#8220;The Indigenous and Popular Uprising of October.  Its Lessons and the Perspectives for Revolutionary Struggle.&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/redphoenixnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/pcmle_00002.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-23965 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/redphoenixnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/pcmle_00002.jpg?resize=700%2C350&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"350\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The country was shaken by the outbreak and development of great struggles of the indigenous<br \/>\npeoples and nationalities, of the workers of the city and countryside, the working class and poor<br \/>\npeasantry, small merchants, the inhabitants of popular neighborhoods in the cities, the teachers<br \/>\nand the progressive intelligentsia, of the great demonstrations of the insurgence of the youth of<br \/>\nthe indigenous communities, the youth strata of the factory workers, the secondary and<br \/>\nuniversity students who went out onto the highways, the streets and squares, indigenous and<br \/>\nworking women, teachers, students and housewives.<\/p>\n<p>These massive manifestations of the discontent and anger of the workers and peoples were<br \/>\ntransformed into the indigenous and popular uprising that brought down the attempts of the<br \/>\ngovernment and imperialism to apply neoliberal measures.<\/p>\n<p>The popular and indigenous uprising that lasted for 12 days in October 2019 demonstrated that<br \/>\nworkers and peoples, women and youth are on their feet, fighting for their interests and rights,<br \/>\nfor freedom and democracy.<\/p>\n<p>The struggle of indigenous peoples and nationalities, led by the CONAIE (Confederation of<br \/>\nIndigenous Nationalities of Ecuador); the workers and social organizations led by the FUT<br \/>\n(Unitary Workers; Front) and the Popular Front; the workers of the city and countryside who do<br \/>\nnot belong to any social and union organizations and broad sectors of the youth won a great<br \/>\nvictory: the repeal of Decree 883, the suspension of labor reforms and the reformulation of the<br \/>\nProject of Growth of the Economy.<\/p>\n<p>The victory of the workers and peoples forced a modification of the policies of the IMF and the<br \/>\ngovernment, and won their economic, political and ideological demands. But it did not change<br \/>\nthe nature of the regime, the rules imposed by the IMF are still in force, big national and<br \/>\ninternational capital maintain these demands. The Moreno government will seek to comply with<br \/>\nthese demands.<\/p>\n<p>The Draft Law on the Growth of the Economy has already been proposed, excluding the labor<br \/>\nreforms, with some reforms from the original draft. It is a project that mainly benefits the large<br \/>\nbusiness owners and bankers, exempts them from taxes on profits and eliminates the advance on<br \/>\ntaxes on profits and the tax on the outflow of foreign currency. This measure was rejected by the<br \/>\nmajority of Assembly members in order to maintain their prestige, faced with the next elections.<br \/>\nAlong the same line of subordination to the International Monetary Fund, the IMF sent the<br \/>\nSimplicity and Progressive Tax draft that was finally approved by the National Assembly, which<br \/>\nresponds mainly to the interests of the capitalist class.<\/p>\n<p>2<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the price of fuel and transportation, the government is seeking to apply a policy of<br \/>\ntargeting subsidies and fares and the implementation of compensation.<\/p>\n<p>The political events of October 2019 and their results have created a new balance of forces.<br \/>\nDuring the most important periods of the denunciation of the corruption of the Correa regime, of<br \/>\nits high officials and the unmasking of acts of authoritarianism, of the verbiage of the open arms<br \/>\nand outstretched hand, the dialogue with all Ecuadorians, a large part of the population was<br \/>\nfavorable to the presidential administration. Moreno&#039;s approval rating was over 70%, he<br \/>\nmanaged to hide the specter of electoral fraud that allowed him to win the election with 51%.<br \/>\nNow, after the victory achieved by the popular and indigenous uprising, the credibility of the<br \/>\nMoreno government fell to only 14%.<\/p>\n<p>The National Assembly has less than 10% approval. The armed forces and the police have<br \/>\nlargely been unmasked as repressive forces serving the interests of the government and the most<br \/>\npowerful economic groups.<\/p>\n<p>During the days of the popular struggle, the big media, television and press showed an<br \/>\nextraordinary partiality towards the theses and proposals of the government and the bourgeoisie;<br \/>\nthese circumstances were seen by the workers and have somewhat diminished the credibility of<br \/>\nthese media.<\/p>\n<p>The capitalist class, the bourgeois political parties, the Social Christian Party, CREO (Creating<br \/>\nOpportunities), SUMA (Society United for More Action) and Alianza Pa\u00eds, which stood firmly<br \/>\non the side of the neoliberal measures, considering them sacred and blessing them, were<br \/>\nunmasked, in part, as enemies of the people.<\/p>\n<p>The diversionist policies that were promoted with the so-called white marches that defended<br \/>\n&amp;quot;peace and tranquility, the sacred principle of private property&amp;quot; failed; they did not fulfill their<br \/>\npurpose of delegitimizing the indigenous and popular uprising, they were reduced to an<br \/>\nimportant and solitary march in Guayaquil, to small showings in other cities.<\/p>\n<p>Nebot, who tried to promote his presidential campaign in the midst of the people&#8217;s struggle, saw<br \/>\nhis political project crumble, as he himself recognize; his racist shouts lost him a part of the<br \/>\nstrength he had accumulated. The Social Christian party from within the Guayaquil Mayor&#8217;s<br \/>\nOffice was seen to be racist.<\/p>\n<p>The pro-Correa forces suffered a new setback. After the unmasking of the feast of public money,<br \/>\nthe corruption, prosecution and imprisonment of the former vice-president, of several former<br \/>\nministers and high officials, he tried to establish himself as the popular opposition to the Moreno<br \/>\nregime. He denounced the neoliberal policies and organized some marches and demonstrations, a<br \/>\nfive-day peasant strike that was unsuccessful. People saw that the pro-Correa forces did not go<br \/>\nout into the street; they did not fight for their authoritarian leader. In the local elections of March<br \/>\n2019, the pro-Correa forces supported the party of a corrupt man who is facing prison and won<br \/>\n11% of the vote and two out of the 23 prefectures.<\/p>\n<p>3<\/p>\n<p>In the popular and indigenous uprising the pro-Correa forces opted for a conspiracy, they<br \/>\ninfiltrated the indigenous movement, the inhabitants of the popular neighborhoods; they carried<br \/>\nout acts of provocation, used the assets and resources of the prefectures to finance their forces,<br \/>\nwhich they kept in action through daily payoffs to participate. They took up positions against the<br \/>\nindigenous nationalities and peoples, the FUT and the Popular Front, the denunciation of the<br \/>\nrepression that they advocated when they were in power, the provocations and acts of vandalism,<br \/>\nas well as the denunciations by the government contributed to their isolation. After the uprising<br \/>\nthey were isolated, they denounced what they called the betrayal of the CONAIE and they<br \/>\nclaimed that they were being politically persecuted.<\/p>\n<p>The pro-Correa forces are weakened but not eliminated. The assessment that he might win the<br \/>\nnext elections is maliciously promoted by the government and the bourgeois political parties that<br \/>\nraise the ghost; they are completely unfounded concerns but worries of the middle strata and<br \/>\nconsiderable sectors of the workers.<\/p>\n<p>In reality, the pro-Correa forces are a political force, they have a firm base; but they are losers. In<br \/>\nthe last elections they only won 11% down from the 54% that they obtained in the 2017<br \/>\nlegislative elections. They were a defeated political alternative in the popular and indigenous<br \/>\nuprising. They are not a big political force, they do not have the potential they claim, but they<br \/>\nshould not be underestimated since their social base comes from sectors of the impoverished<br \/>\nlaboring classes of the city and the countryside.<\/p>\n<p>In the popular camp important qualitative changes took place that are influencing the social and<br \/>\npolitical forces, the consciousness of the working masses and youth, of the whole of society.<br \/>\nThe indigenous movement and particularly the CONAIE are better situated than in the<br \/>\nimmediate past, they are recognized for their organization, consistency and courage in the<br \/>\nstruggle, for the correctness of their proposals, for the seriousness of their main spokespersons<br \/>\nand leaders.<\/p>\n<p>The accumulated strength of the indigenous movement forms an important force in the workers\u2019<br \/>\nand popular movement, in the political parties and organizations of the left.<\/p>\n<p>Pachakutik, a party that is an important part of the indigenous movement, reaffirms its validity in<br \/>\nthe territories where it has been showing strength and significance and it is growing in the minds<br \/>\nof the workers and peoples throughout the country.<\/p>\n<p>The working class, above all, its sectors organized in the class federations that are part of the<br \/>\nFUT waged an important struggle; they were organizers and protagonists of the national strike<br \/>\nthat took place on October 9, within the framework of the popular and indigenous uprising. The<br \/>\ndemands proposed, mainly the opposition to labor flexibility, were taken up by the working class<br \/>\nas a whole, including by the rank-and-file of the yellow union federations made up of the pro-<br \/>\nCorrea forces and sponsored by Moreno.<\/p>\n<p>4<\/p>\n<p>The victory of the workers was materialized in the suspension of the original Draft Law on the<br \/>\nGrowth of the Economy during the popular and indigenous uprising and later, in the withdrawal<br \/>\nof the parts of the labor reform from the new draft of the same Law after the end of the people&#039;s<br \/>\nstruggle.<\/p>\n<p>The FUT reaffirmed its position as the main organization of the workers among its own rank-<br \/>\nand-file and beyond, to a good part of the working class centered in other plants, to considerable<br \/>\nsectors of the unorganized workers who make up the majority.<\/p>\n<p>The UGTE (General Union of the Workers of Ecuador) took a decisive part in the call,<br \/>\norganization and development of the national strike. To a great extent, it developed the debate in<br \/>\nthe union assemblies, promoted the nature, ideological and political tasks and the responsibilities<br \/>\nof the working class towards the other laboring classes and society. As a result of its<br \/>\nparticipation and the end of the popular and indigenous uprising, the UGTE can show the support<br \/>\nof its rank-and-file and the sympathy of other sectors of the working class; it can be proud of the<br \/>\npossibilities for its reaffirmation and development, it must take advantage of the situation in<br \/>\norder to advance.<\/p>\n<p>The union and social organizations that make up the Popular Front, the UGTE, FEUNASSC<br \/>\n(United National Federation of Affiliates to Peasants\u2019 Social Security), UNE (National Union of<br \/>\nEducators), CUCOMITAE (Unitary Federation of Retail Merchants and Self-Employed Workers<br \/>\nof Ecuador), CUBE (Unitary Federation of Neighborhoods of Ecuador), Women for Change,<br \/>\nFESE (Federation of Secondary Students of Ecuador), FEUE (Federation of University Students<br \/>\nof Ecuador) and UNAPE (National Union of People\u2019s Artists of Ecuador) participated with a<br \/>\ngood part of their rank-and-file in the various days of the popular and indigenous uprising; their<br \/>\nleaders were determined and courageous fighters, their members and rank-and-file were fired up<br \/>\nand nourished by the lessons of the struggle of the masses, by the development of new and varied<br \/>\nforms of struggle, their banners were seen by the fighters in the streets and squares.<br \/>\nThe Popular Front, the social and political forces that comprise it, came out strengthened from<br \/>\nthe struggles of October; they have the space, the conditions and responsibilities to situate<br \/>\nthemselves in the new scenarios and to advance in the consolidation of their organization, to<br \/>\ndevelop new struggles and, above all, to insist on the obligation to educate the rank-and-file<br \/>\npolitically, to build revolutionary consciousness in the minds, organization and action of the<br \/>\nmasses.<\/p>\n<p>The Popular Unity reaffirmed during the events its nature as a party of the revolutionary left; its<br \/>\nleaders, its rank-and-file, affiliates and sympathizers were actively integrated into the direct<br \/>\npolitical response to the anti-popular and anti-national policies of the Moreno government. They<br \/>\ndenounced them in a timely manner and clarified their neoliberal nature, the intention to shift the<br \/>\nweight of the crisis on the shoulders of the workers and peoples.<\/p>\n<p>5<\/p>\n<p>The members of Popular Unity were present within the social organizations; they took part in the<br \/>\ndebate and making of decisions and they joined the struggle in the neighborhoods, the unions and<br \/>\nthe organizations of teachers, peasants and students.<\/p>\n<p>The Popular Unity said \u201cwe are present,\u201d its banners flew in the streets and squares of the<br \/>\ncountry. On October 2, in the street demonstration that began the struggles that developed into<br \/>\nthe popular and indigenous uprising, the Popular Unity raised the slogan &amp;quot;Neither Moreno Nor<br \/>\nCorrea; Only the People Can Save the People&amp;quot;, which was chanted by thousands of protesters<br \/>\nduring the days of the popular struggle.<\/p>\n<p>The Popular Unity confirmed its character as a left party that represents and fights for the<br \/>\ninterests and rights of the working masses and youth. It has put forth new challenges and the<br \/>\npossibility to face them in order to advance steadily in their organization and relevance in the<br \/>\nminds of the people.<\/p>\n<p>Other organizations and movements of the revolutionary left, the Revolutionary Movement of<br \/>\nWorkers (MRT), the Movement of the Revolutionary Left (MIR), the Jos\u00e9 Carlos Mari\u00e1tegui<br \/>\nMovement, the Guevarista Liberation Movement, Revolt and others were directly involved in the<br \/>\nfight; they fought side by side with the indigenous people, the workers and youth; they<br \/>\ndisseminated their proposals and slogans. A good part of the rank-and-file of the Socialist Party<br \/>\nwere also involved, despite the silence of its leadership. In the course of the struggle, unity in<br \/>\naction was concretized. It was possible to fight together against the common enemy,<br \/>\nneoliberalism and the Moreno government. These circumstances pose certain possibilities for<br \/>\nadvancing in the unitary process of the revolutionary left.<\/p>\n<p>The popular struggle became the crucible and the test by which these formations of the<br \/>\nrevolutionary left were made visible and strengthened.<\/p>\n<p>An important result of the development of the popular and indigenous uprising is the<br \/>\nconsiderable level of unity in action, among the parties and organizations of the revolutionary<br \/>\nleft, which was forged in the midst of the struggle. The common objectives, the justness of the<br \/>\ncause, the strength and decisiveness of the indigenous movement and, of course, the nature of the<br \/>\nforces of the revolutionary left allowed them to put aside, on a secondary level, the ideological<br \/>\nand political differences and place unity in the center of the struggle.<br \/>\nThese events pose for the present, the immediate future and the medium term the possibility of<br \/>\nfinding meeting points for the discussion of the projects and policies among all the left<br \/>\nrevolutionaries, to advance to agreements of a programmatic nature in the medium and long<br \/>\nterm.<\/p>\n<p>A new scenario arises for the party of the proletariat, the certainty that it is possible to speak, to<br \/>\ndiscuss projects, that progress can be made in building the unity of the revolutionary forces.<br \/>\nWe propose to open the debate on the basis of equality, to put aside prejudices, to get to know<br \/>\neach other and to set goals and paths. We maintain, as in the past, that nobody has the right to<\/p>\n<p>6<\/p>\n<p>impose their project or their points of view, as well as that no organization has the power to veto<br \/>\nthe agreements. We are in favor of open, frank and democratic discussion of majority<br \/>\nagreements. We reject the policy of consensus, which is nothing other than the right to veto.<br \/>\nThe party of the proletariat was involved in a direct and responsible manner, in the orientation<br \/>\nand propaganda, in the debate among the social organizations and groups to propose and guide<br \/>\nthe resistance and the struggle against the neoliberal policies implemented by the government of<br \/>\nMoreno. We committed ourselves to work in the provincial and national assemblies and the<br \/>\ncongresses of the workers and social organizations; we were present at the Conventions of the<br \/>\nFUT and we encouraged unity and the call for the national strike.<\/p>\n<p>For months the Party and its forces have been involved in spreading and discussing the call for<br \/>\nthe national strike, the work of organizing it among the rank-and-file of the social and union<br \/>\norganizations, in the places where we have an impact and responsibilities. We understood that<br \/>\nthe decision and the call were important but that they had to be taken up by the masses.<br \/>\nThe Party took a decisive part, its members and sympathizers were in the frontlines of the battle,<br \/>\nin the streets and squares, on the roads and highways. They were able to involve a good part of<br \/>\nthe party&#039;s social base, important sectors of the masses of workers, youth and women.<br \/>\nThe participation of the membership in the popular struggles of October provided great lessons:<br \/>\nit reaffirmed the proletarian conceptions of the role of the masses in history, of the role of unity<br \/>\nin the struggle, in the objectives and proposals, in the present and the future, in the struggle as<br \/>\nthe way to defend and win the interests and rights of the masses. It allowed the forging and<br \/>\nsteeling of the revolutionary convictions; it broadened the view of the communists of the role<br \/>\nand nature of the other revolutionary political organizations.<\/p>\n<p>The assessment that is being carried out regarding what the popular indigenous uprising was and<br \/>\nmeant, of the new scenarios and spaces that resulted from the victory achieved by the struggle,<br \/>\nshows that the vast majority of the members were directly involved in the fighting, that this<br \/>\nparticipation affirmed them in the positive evaluation of the Party and its policies as an<br \/>\nexpression of the most advanced revolutionary thought, as the most determined and ready for the<br \/>\nfight.<\/p>\n<p>In these battles, we made significant progress in the process of the accumulation of revolutionary<br \/>\nforces.<\/p>\n<p>The bourgeoisie is trying to delegitimize the popular struggle<\/p>\n<p>The ruling classes and the political parties of the bourgeoisie are aware of these new<br \/>\ncircumstances, above all, of the potential of the popular forces and the revolutionary left, and<br \/>\nthey are unleashing a big ideological and political offensive; they are unleashing a real witch<br \/>\nhunt, they are criminalizing social fighters and the leaders of the indigenous people and of the<br \/>\nworkers.<\/p>\n<p>7<\/p>\n<p>Now, after the defeat inflicted by the indigenous and popular uprising, they are claiming that the<br \/>\ncountry has been devastated by vandalism and the excesses of the protesters, that they have lost<br \/>\nhundreds of millions of dollars and that finally, &amp;quot;we are all losers&amp;quot;, that the struggle and its<br \/>\noutcome did not lead to winners or losers.<\/p>\n<p>They talked of the existence of an international plot, the participation of foreigners, of<br \/>\nColombian guerrillas and pro-Maduro activists, of the planning and carrying out of terrorist acts,<br \/>\nof the establishment of the urban guerrilla, all in order to discredit the struggle.<\/p>\n<p>The entire bourgeoisie is telling these lies, calling the masses who took part in the struggle<br \/>\nirrational, contingents led in an authoritarian manner by leaders whom they demonize as enemies<br \/>\nof democracy and freedom. They are announcing and preparing anti-insurgent policies and<br \/>\nactions, as well as the improvement of the information and intelligence services, whose actors<br \/>\nare the Armed Forces and the Police.<\/p>\n<p>The work of the big media in the development of this ideological and political attack is intense<br \/>\nand demands a timely and sustained response from the revolutionary forces and, especially, from<br \/>\nthe party of the proletariat.<\/p>\n<p>They boast of their democratic &amp;quot;disposition&amp;quot; and that they recognize the right of workers and<br \/>\npeoples to protest, to make demands; but they condemn what they call acts of vandalism and<br \/>\nterrorism. They call the popular and indigenous uprising just, they recognize that they were<br \/>\nwrong in their analysis and proposals, but they denigrate the social fighters, they call them<br \/>\nviolent, that they are attacking peace and private property. They recognize the right of the<br \/>\nindigenous people to oppose the cultural discrimination and segregation of which they are<br \/>\nvictims and at the same time they accuse them of being revanchists, of opposing progress. They<br \/>\ndeclare themselves to be friends and supporters of the peasants, of the rural workers whom they<br \/>\nidentify as the forgotten ones, those ignored by all the governments and they claim that the<br \/>\ndecrees and measures are aimed at their salvation. They say that the regime is the standard bearer<br \/>\nfor dialogue, that it has its arms outstretched and its hands open to talk and build consensus for<br \/>\nthe good of the country, of the need to make sacrifices now in order to enjoy tomorrow and at the<br \/>\nsame time they call for repression, the use of tear gas, horses and motorized vehicles to defend<br \/>\nthe order threatened by the people&#8217;s struggle.<\/p>\n<p>These tales of the government and the reactionary political parties, of the chambers of<br \/>\ncommerce, of most of the big media, of the heads of the Catholic Church lie about the events that<br \/>\noccurred in the indigenous and popular uprising in October; they distort them. For the tens of<br \/>\nthousands of people who took a direct part in the struggles, in the city and the countryside, in the<br \/>\nstreets and squares, things are clear, but this is not the same for the vast majority of the<br \/>\npopulation who ar the object of this ideological manipulation.<\/p>\n<p>Facts are stubborn things; they show the reasons for the social struggle<br \/>\nThe proletarian revolutionaries, the men and women who make up the workers\u2019 and popular<br \/>\nmovement, the social actors of the indigenous movement must take up the responsibility of<\/p>\n<p>8<\/p>\n<p>denouncing these fallacies and make clear again and again the nature of the events and their<br \/>\nresults.<\/p>\n<p>We, the indigenous people and the workers of the city and countryside, are not criminals,<br \/>\nvandals, much less terrorists or saboteurs; we are the labor force that sustains the life and<br \/>\ndevelopment of society.<\/p>\n<p>These were hard days for the workers in industry, in the mines and construction who create the<br \/>\nwealth of the country that allows for the satisfaction of the vital needs of the Ecuadorians, even<br \/>\nthough for now, much of that wealth is expropriated by the employers. It is the labor of millions<br \/>\nof peasants that allows us to meet the daily needs of the Ecuadorians, food; it is the work of<br \/>\nagricultural wage earners that makes possible the export of agricultural products and livestock,<br \/>\nwhich provides foreign exchange for the purchase of products that need to be imported. It is the<br \/>\ndaily work of the self-employed workers that allows for much of the production and exchange of<br \/>\nuseful goods. The activity of the teachers, health-care workers and public servants provides the<br \/>\ndaily dynamic of society.<\/p>\n<p>The acts of vandalism that took place during the uprising, which certainly took place, were the<br \/>\nwork of the provocateurs of the pro-Correa forces and the repressive forces that were trying to<br \/>\nplace the blame on the popular fighters.<\/p>\n<p>It is recognized by all that the 11 dead, the 1,340 wounded and the 1,152 arrested were from the<br \/>\nranks of the social fighters, who were victims of the brutal repression ordered by the<br \/>\ngovernment. The Mission of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights itself reaffirmed<br \/>\nthis. That means that the social mobilizations and the action of the popular fighters were<br \/>\ndefensive, responding to the bullets and tear gas with shouts, sticks and stones.<br \/>\nOn the other hand, the indigenous and popular uprising in October set goals and achieved them;<br \/>\nthe government and the oligarchy set goals for themselves and were unable to achieve them.<br \/>\nThere were massive battles that achieved a great victory.<\/p>\n<p>The clearly established truth is that Ecuadorians do not have to pay more for fuel and<br \/>\ntransportation, that the hourly contract and labor flexibility did not pass, that the wages of the<br \/>\nworkers were not lowered. The reality is that we millions of Ecuadorians were able to see on<br \/>\ntelevision how the President surrendered to the just demands of the indigenous and popular<br \/>\nmovement. The workers and peoples won a momentous victory.<\/p>\n<p>It is clear that the great loser was the government and the whole of the ruling classes that were<br \/>\nforced to back down from their attempts to free up fuel prices.<\/p>\n<p>The democratic verbiage with which they supposedly recognize the people&#039;s right to make<br \/>\ndemands and protest aims at masking the authoritarian, arrogant and repressive nature of the<br \/>\nregime; it clashes with the facts, with the measures to strengthen the military capacity to silence<br \/>\nthe social protest.<\/p>\n<p>Unity was forged and developed in combat<\/p>\n<p>9<\/p>\n<p>The indigenous and popular uprising was a great example of the unity of the workers and<br \/>\npeoples, of the working women and youth, the left-wing political parties and organizations. The<br \/>\npolitical unity was forged in the discussion among the indigenous communities of the CONAIE,<br \/>\namong the rank-and-file workers in the unions, in the provincial and national federations, in the<br \/>\nFUT, in the trade union and social organizations that make up the Popular Front, in the debate<br \/>\namong the social and political activists and collectives that defend nature and the environment.<br \/>\nThis political unity was concretized in a common Platform, in specific targets, in the demand that<br \/>\nthe government repeal the neoliberal measures and the labor flexibility. Unity was expressed in<br \/>\nthe struggle, in the streets and squares, in the territories and on the highways, in the daily<br \/>\nassemblies that analyzed the progress of the fight.<\/p>\n<p>These important expressions of the unity of the working masses, the peoples and the youth form<br \/>\nthe basis to advance more decisively in the building of unity for the seizure of power, for the<br \/>\nbuilding of socialism.<\/p>\n<p>Our responsibilities demand that we continue developing, under current conditions, the unity of<br \/>\nthe workers, peoples and youth in order to confront and overcome the arrogance of the<br \/>\nemployers, for the defense of our rights, for the winning of the demands of the masses.<br \/>\nOnly the unity of the workers within their trade union and social organization will allow us to<br \/>\nclarify the reasons for the fight, to identify our true friends and determine our enemies, and fight<br \/>\ndecisively against their policies and for the interests of the masses. A union unified around the<br \/>\nimmediate and medium-term aims of its members will be able to develop a consistent leadership<br \/>\nthat will have the courage to achieve its goals. The unity forged in each of the social and union<br \/>\norganizations is the stage for the politicization of the masses, to forge and affirm the political<br \/>\nobjectives of the seizure of popular power.<\/p>\n<p>It is necessary to move from unity in one union and one commune to unity among the unions, to<br \/>\nthe forging of fraternal ties among the workers of one Federation, one province, one sector of<br \/>\nproduction. We must advance in the formation of unitary structures with the other sectors of the<br \/>\nworking class and peasantry, the youth and teachers.<\/p>\n<p>The achievements made in the formation of the Collective of Social Organizations and in the<br \/>\nParliament of the Peoples should serve as a basis to advance in forging the ideological and<br \/>\npolitical unity of the workers with the indigenous movement, social organizations and activists<br \/>\nwho defend nature and the environment. We must work so that the activists of the indigenous<br \/>\nand popular uprising work in a united way to take up all the tasks of social and political life.<br \/>\nThe Party must learn from the experiences achieved in the forging of the revolutionary<br \/>\nmovement of the masses, the unitary organizations that are being built; it must work to<br \/>\nconsolidate and develop them; it must use it as a basis to broaden the unity to other social<br \/>\nsectors.<\/p>\n<p>The Popular Front as an expression of coordination and action of the class-struggle union<br \/>\norganizations, of the poor peasantry, the small merchants, the poor neighborhood residents, the<\/p>\n<p>10<\/p>\n<p>secondary and university students, the women must be taken seriously by the provincial<br \/>\ncommittees, by the national leadership, by the members and leaders of the party.<br \/>\nThe FUT is an organization in which various union federations and different political positions<br \/>\nconverge; it is an organization that has won an important place within the working class and<br \/>\npeople. The responsibilities taken up by the FUT must be completely fulfilled. We must actively<br \/>\nparticipate in the debate, in the making of decisions and be consistent in the application of these<br \/>\ndecisions.<\/p>\n<p>The political situation in the country, the important development of the organization and struggle<br \/>\nof the indigenous peoples and nationalities, the presence and activity of the CONAIE reaffirm<br \/>\nthe proposals of the Political Line regarding the role of the indigenous movement in the<br \/>\nEcuadorian revolution; they demand a sustained and long-term work for building the unity of the<br \/>\nworkers and peoples and, especially, with the indigenous peoples and nationalities.<br \/>\nThe multicultural nature of the country exists within the workers\u2019 and popular movement; in it<br \/>\nworkers, men and women, youth and adults, mestizos, indigenous and blacks come together, the<br \/>\nvariously colored nature of the workers and the peoples. The building of a fraternal and<br \/>\nrevolutionary interculturality among the social historical actors of the Ecuadorian revolution is a<br \/>\nresponsibility shared by all of them. The banners of social and national liberation, the red flag of<br \/>\nthe workers, the wipala of the indigenous movement, the national tricolor must fly in all the<br \/>\npopular struggles, in all the proposals and programs.<\/p>\n<p>The political and organizational ties that are being developed within the popular movement show<br \/>\nthe party&#039;s decision to work in that direction and make clear the readiness and determination of<br \/>\nother political and social forces to come together in actions and organizations to strengthen the<br \/>\npopular bloc, to lead it to the seizure of popular power.<br \/>\nMarxism-Leninism, the general guidelines of the PCMLE, the concrete conjunctural proposals<br \/>\nserve as a guide for the work of the proletarian revolutionaries; work must be done to bring the<br \/>\nrevolutionary theory, the programmatic proposals of the revolution and socialism to the broad<br \/>\nmasses.<\/p>\n<p>The unity of the leftists<\/p>\n<p>The task of building the United Revolutionary Front requires a unitary work of the Party within<br \/>\nthe working class, the other laboring classes and the indigenous movement; it also demands a<br \/>\nunitary policy towards the other parties and political organizations of the revolutionary left.<br \/>\nThe overthrow of the power of imperialism and the big bourgeoisie, the establishment of popular<br \/>\npower and the building of the society of the workers are objectives of the working class and<br \/>\npeoples, they require the struggle of the workers of the city and the countryside, of the youth,<br \/>\nthey demand the building, in the course of the struggle, of the unity of the motive forces of the<br \/>\nrevolution, of the social and political actors.<\/p>\n<p>11<\/p>\n<p>The PCMLE has been taking up its responsibility in organizing the revolution, in the process of<br \/>\naccumulating forces, in the multiple activities that are taking place in the confrontation of the<br \/>\nworkers and youth with the employers, the bourgeois state and the governments in office.<br \/>\nOn this path, other parties and political organizations of the revolutionary left are converging<br \/>\nwith whom we agree in the streets, in the strike movement, in the joint confrontation with the<br \/>\npolicies of the bourgeoisie; they also involve the ecologists and environmentalists, the supporters<br \/>\nof the Yasuni [a large national park in the Amazon region of Ecuador \u2013 translator\u2019s note], the<br \/>\nfighters for human rights, the activists of the movement of the women, of the LGBTI, the leftist<br \/>\nintellectuals and non-party fighters. With all of them we must build unity against the<br \/>\nestablishment, against imperialism and the government in office.<\/p>\n<p>Each organization has its own programmatic proposals, political lines and strategic objectives;<br \/>\nthey have a leadership and membership that fights for those purposes. We all consider ourselves<br \/>\nrevolutionaries, we call ourselves anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist fighters; we carry out actions in<br \/>\nthe workers\u2019 and youth movement.<\/p>\n<p>In the daily fight against the policies of imperialism and the bourgeoisie, basically, there are<br \/>\ncommon points, reasons to unite our energy and forces.<\/p>\n<p>On the basis of these facts, the PCMLE proposes to open the debate, on the basis of equality,<br \/>\nwith all the political parties and organizations of the left, to find the points of union, to point out<br \/>\ndifferences but not to raise them as barriers to hinder unity, to seek concrete agreements, to walk<br \/>\nand fight together.<\/p>\n<p>The PCMLE does not have attitudes of hegemony. It does not try to impose its lines on anyone,<br \/>\nbut it does not renounce its obligation to circulate them and put them forward among the masses,<br \/>\nto discuss them with other revolutionaries.<\/p>\n<p>The PCMLE proclaims its willingness to seek agreements, under all circumstances and in all<br \/>\nplaces, to join forces to win, through struggle, the demands of the masses, to work persistently<br \/>\nfor commitments of programmatic content that go beyond unity in the struggle, that propose<br \/>\npolitical objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Ecuador, March 2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The country was shaken by the outbreak and development of great struggles of the indigenous peoples and nationalities, of the workers of the city and..<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":37407,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[193],"class_list":["post-23963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-ecuador"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/redphoenix.news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/pcmle_00002.jpg?fit=1600%2C800&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23963\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redphoenix.news\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}